Williams v. Naftzger
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Bernardino County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
The defendants King and La Baron executed a mortgage to the plaintiff in 1887, upon certain lands in the county of San Bernardino, .to secure the payment of their note for two thousand dollars. In October, 1888, these defendants conveyed the mortgaged premises to their codefendants, Naftzger, Merrill, and Kanavel, subject to the lien of said mortgage; and the said grantees, as a part of the consideration for said conveyance, promised to pay said promissory note, and to secure the discharge and release of the mortgage. In July, 1891, each of these grantees signed and acknowledged a deed of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Keller v. AshfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Biddel v. BrizzolaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- Crawford v. EdwardsMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
- Halsey v. ReedNew York Court of Chancery · 1842
- Stuart v. HerveyNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
3Cited by39 opinions
- Hartman Ranch Co. v. Associated Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
- Bogart v. George K. Porter Co.California Supreme Court · 1924
- Everts v. MattesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Braun v. CrewCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Sanders v. MagillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.