Mueller v. City of Vancouver
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Clarice county, Darch, J., entered August 25, 1913, upon findings in favor of the plaintiffs, in an action to restrain the assessment of property for a local improvement, after a trial on the merits.
1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.
— -This action was brought by plaintiffs to restrain an assessment levied against property owned by them abutting Patulla avenue, in the city of Vancouver, Washington. The court found that the contractors had not complied with the specifications of the contract and that the defendant city had not exercised good faith in accepting the same. The testimony is conflicting, and we regret that we are compelled to make a finding contrary to that made by the trial judge. This is a trial de novo. We have carefully examined the statement of facts, and under the rule announced in the recent case of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Borde v. KingsleyWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- City of Forth Yakima v. ScudderWashington Supreme Court · 1905
- Morehouse v. Clerk of EdmondsWashington Supreme Court · 1912
- Connolly v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1912
- Haisch v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1894
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Davis v. RogersWashington Supreme Court · 1924
- Cornwall v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- Laughlin v. Seattle Taxicab & Transfer Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915
- Bryan v. BlodgettWashington Supreme Court · 1921