Legal Opinion

Haisch v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1894No. 1519PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King County.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dunbar, C. J.

It would seem from the record in this, case, that the contract which the city entered into on June 26, 1890, or which it attempted to enter into, through Mayor Moran, was not in conformity with the ordinance which had been passed by the council, providing for the improvement of South Twelfth street, as said ordinance required the street to be graded from Yesler avenue to Stacy street, and sidewalks constructed on both co-extensive with the grade thereof between said points, under the'direction and supervision of the city engineer. This…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Buckley v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  2. City of Spokane Falls v. BrowneWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Or. & Cal. R. R. v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Forth Yakima v. ScudderWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  2. State ex rel. Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Mueller v. City of VancouverWashington Supreme Court · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API