Legal Opinion

Davis v. Rogers

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1924No. 18229PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMackintosh, J.

In 1905, the respondent and his wife were the principal stockholders find officers in the Davis-Comstock Company, which owned coal' land in this state. About that year there was given permission to the appellants to prospect'the property and an option to purchase it. In the prospecting operations the appellants expended some $6,000, and they did not exercise the option. The Davis-Comstock Company was desirous of disposing of the property and the appellants desired, if possible, to recoup their loss in connection with it. On December 12, 191Í, the1 DavisComstock Company, in consideration of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. Oregon Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Peyton v. PeytonWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Arthur & Co. v. BurkeWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Ferry v. FerryWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Ackerson v. ElliottWashington Supreme Court · 1917

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Strong v. ClarkWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Shepard v. HolmesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  3. Kilbourne v. KilbourneWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Lou v. Bethany Lutheran Church of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Dowgialla v. KnevageWashington Supreme Court · 1956

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API