Legal Opinion

Cornwall v. Anderson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 1915No. 12304PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Sullivan, J., entered April 7, 1914, upon findings in favor of the plaintiffs, in consolidated actions on promissory notes, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

By stipulation between the parties, the appeals in these two cases have been heard as one appeal. *370Each of the actions is a suit upon a promissory note in favor of the plaintiff and respondent, signed by W. W. Scott and appellants D. Moylan and F. W. Anderson. The appellants defended separately, being represented by different counsel, but their defense was the same and rested upon the same state of facts. By stipulation the actions were consolidated for trial and tried to the court without a jury. Scott was not made a party to either action. The defense of the appellants was duress. The facts…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Galusha v. ShermanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Joannin v. OgilvieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  3. Baker v. Yakima Valley Canal Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Sulzner v. Cappeau-Lemley & Miller Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  5. Parmentier v. PaterOregon Supreme Court · 1885

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hastain v. GreenbaumSupreme Court of Kansas · 1970
  2. Tucker v. ADG, INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
  3. State Ex Rel. Bradford v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Western Paving Co. v. SifersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  5. Whitman Realty & Investment Co. v. DayWashington Supreme Court · 1931

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API