Laughlin v. Seattle Taxicab & Transfer Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Humphries, J., entered April 6, 1914, dismissing an action for personal injuries sustained by pedestrians struck by a taxicab, tried to the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.
Plaintiffs, while crossing Stewart street at Second avenue, in the city of Seattle, were struck by a taxicab driven by an employee of the defendant. Plaintiffs brought this action alleging negligence in several particulars, more particularly that the machine was driven at a speed greater than ten miles an hour and that no horn was blown *343or sounded, or warning given. Defendant plead and relied at the trial on the defense of contributory negligence. Stewart street is about thirty-five feet wide from curb to curb. When plaintiffs had taken a step or two into Stewart street, they saw the taxicab…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Baker v. Yakima Valley Canal Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
- Borde v. KingsleyWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Johnsen v. JohnsenWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Zizich v. Holman Security Investment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
- Mueller v. City of VancouverWashington Supreme Court · 1914
3Cited by3 opinions
- Neville v. Postal Telegraph Cable Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1930
- Bryan v. BlodgettWashington Supreme Court · 1921
- Jackson v. ForwoodCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946