Legal Opinion

Laughlin v. Seattle Taxicab & Transfer Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1915No. 12231PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Humphries, J., entered April 6, 1914, dismissing an action for personal injuries sustained by pedestrians struck by a taxicab, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.

Plaintiffs, while crossing Stewart street at Second avenue, in the city of Seattle, were struck by a taxicab driven by an employee of the defendant. Plaintiffs brought this action alleging negligence in several particulars, more particularly that the machine was driven at a speed greater than ten miles an hour and that no horn was blown *343or sounded, or warning given. Defendant plead and relied at the trial on the defense of contributory negligence. Stewart street is about thirty-five feet wide from curb to curb. When plaintiffs had taken a step or two into Stewart street, they saw the taxicab…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Baker v. Yakima Valley Canal Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Borde v. KingsleyWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Johnsen v. JohnsenWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Zizich v. Holman Security Investment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Mueller v. City of VancouverWashington Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Neville v. Postal Telegraph Cable Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1930
  2. Bryan v. BlodgettWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Jackson v. ForwoodCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API