Legal Opinion

Borde v. Kingsley

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 1913No. 11376PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Mackintosh, J., entered February 10, 1913, upon findings in favor of the defendant, in an action for damages for fraud on the sale of corporate stock, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.

The court below made findings in favor of the respondent. The facts are somewhat conflicting, and to undertake to state them in detail would put upon us the burden of reciting the respective contentions of the parties. We find the facts to be that respondent held an option upon ten mining claims and a mill site, located on the Nespelem river, in Okanogan county. In February, 1909, he organized a mining company. He made himself president of this company, and was at all times the moving spirit and directing genius of its affairs. He prepared a communication directed to the company in which he…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Conta v. CorgiatWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Bell v. Jovita Heights Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Baker v. Yakima Valley Canal Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Christensen v. KochWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Rainier National Bank v. ClausingCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983
  4. Boehme v. Broadway Theater Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Cornwall v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1915

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API