Morehouse v. Clerk of Edmonds
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Snohomish county, Black, J., entered June 19, 1911, upon granting a nonsuit, in an action on contract.
1Opinion of the CourtGose, J.
This is a suit to recover an alleged balance due upon a street improvement contract. At the close of the plaintiff’s testimony, the case was'withdrawn from the jury and a judgment of dismissal and for costs was entered. Plaintiff prosecutes the appeal.
The contract provides, that the improvement shaljl be made under the superintendence of the street committee of the city council and subject to its acceptance and approval; that the improvement shall not be deemed completed until the city council shall have filed with the city clerk a statement, signed by a majority of them, to the effect that…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Weston v. . City of SyracuseNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- City St. Improvement Co. v. City of MarysvilleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Schmidt v. City of North YakimaWashington Supreme Court · 1895
- School District No. 5 v. SageWashington Supreme Court · 1896
- Craig v. GeddisWashington Supreme Court · 1892
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Interstate Bldg. & Loan Co. v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- State ex rel. Murphy v. ColemanWashington Supreme Court · 1912
- Stott v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1915
- Mueller v. City of VancouverWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Boyer v. City of YakimaWashington Supreme Court · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.