Legal Opinion
Breedlove v. J. W. & E. M. BreedLove Excavating Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 17, 1942No. Civ. 13572PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOULD, J. pro tem.
Defendants appeal from two pendente lite orders. One, granted March 24, 1941, restrained and enjoined them pending the trial from disposing of any money or property received in connection with certain operations of the business of defendant copartnership, excepting only the payment of the ordinary expenses thereof, and required that the moneys coming into the possession of defendants from the conduct of their business be placed in a named depositary. The other order, made May 22, 1941, appointed a receiver to take charge of certain books and moneys of defendants and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Willis v. LauridsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Whitley v. BradleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
- Davies v. RamsdellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Dabney Oil Co. v. Providence Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1913
- California Delta Farms, Inc. v. Chinese American Farms, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1928
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Loomis v. LoomisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Armbrust v. ArmbrustCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Sibert v. ShaverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Moore v. ObergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Baldwin v. BaldwinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.