Whitley v. Bradley
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, appointing a receiver pendente lite. James M. Seawell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
This is an appeal from an order appointing a receiver, pendente lite.
The complaint alleges that “on or about the fourth day of January, 1907, at the city of San Francisco, state of California, said plaintiffs and said defendant entered into an agreement wherein and whereby said parties agreed to form a copartnership for the purpose of carrying on the business of manufacturing and selling cement wash-trays and doing a general cement construction business—said business to be conducted under the firm name of 1 California Cement Tray Company, ’ and it was then and there agreed that each of said…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mead v. BurkIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
- McCrary v. SlaughterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
- Cameron v. Groveland Improvement Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1898
- Brooke v. TuckerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
- Naylor v. SidenerIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Brown v. Memorial National Home FoundationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Doudell v. ShooCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- Lyon v. MacQuarrieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Armbrust v. ArmbrustCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Breedlove v. J. W. & E. M. BreedLove Excavating Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.