Legal Opinion
Moore v. Oberg
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 29, 1943No. Civ. 14147PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.
Defendants appeal (1) from an ex parte order appointing a receiver and (2) from the order confirming such appointment. The errors assigned are (1) that there was no property in danger of “being lost, removed or materially injured”; (2) that in issuing the order to show cause the court cast upon defendants the “burden of proving the impropriety of the initial action”; (3) that the court con sidered affidavits filed by plaintiff at the time of the hearing; (4) that the court abused its discretion by confirming, the appointment.
The complaint and the affidavits established that prior to June 8,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Difani v. Riverside County Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1927
- A. G. Col Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Sunset Farms, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Fischer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- McAuliffe v. CoughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Armbrust v. ArmbrustCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Sibert v. ShaverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Baldwin v. BaldwinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Neider v. DardiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Sachs v. KilleenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.