Legal Opinion
Willis v. Lauridson
California Supreme Court
Decided October 9, 1911No. Sac. No. 1857PublishedCited by 32 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Grove L. Johnson, and Wahrhaftig & Shinn, for Appellants.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
By reason of the disagreement of the justices of the district court of appeal for the third appellate district, the above entitled cause was certified to this court.
In the district court of appeal, Chipman, J., prepared the 'following opinion, which, meeting the views of this court, is hereby adopted, and, for the reasons in that opinion given, the order appealed from is reversed, with directions to the trial court to grant defendants’ motion to vacate the injunction:
“A temporary injunction was granted upon plaintiff’s verified complaint. Defendants, other than Lauridson and Barry,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Minnesota v. Northern Securities Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Talbot J. Taylor & Co. v. Southern Pac. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Kentucky · 1903
- St. Louis Street Flushing Mach. Co. v. Sanitary Street Flushing Mach. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1908
- Bishop v. OwensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
- State ex rel. Burton v. Missouri & Kansas Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1908
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- E. H. Renzel Co. v. Ware-Housemen's Union I. L. A. 38-44California Supreme Court · 1940
- Fairchild v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Thayer Plymouth Center, Inc. v. Chrysler Motors Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1967
- Bank of America National Trust & Saving Ass'n v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Genazzi v. County of MarinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.