Dabney Oil Co. v. Providence Oil Co.
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County made pendente lite appointing a receiver. Frank G-. Finlayson, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. J. S. McKnight, Murphey & Poplin, Kemp, Mitchell & Silberberg, Ben. Goodrich, and Geo. E. Whitaker, for Appellants.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
This is an appeal from an order of court made pendente lite appointing a receiver.
The action grew out of the following facts: Plaintiff was and is a corporation organized under the laws of the state of Arizona, and authorized to do business in California. In March, 1908, it was, and -had been for several years, the owner of a leasehold estate in one hundred and ten acres of oil-producing lands in the MeKittrick District, and the owner in fee of one hundred and sixty acres of undeveloped 'and unproved oil lands in the Midway District, all in Kern County. During the years 1906, 1907, and 1908…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hayes v. Jasper Land Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1906
- Hickey v. Parrot Silver & Copper Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1901
- Secord v. Wheeler Gold Mining Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
- Roberts v. Washington National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1894
- Frostburg Building Ass'n v. StarkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1877
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Marsch v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- A. G. Col Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Golden State Glass Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Cohen v. HerbertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Breedlove v. J. W. & E. M. BreedLove Excavating Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.