Legal Opinion
Baldwin v. Baldwin
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 4, 1944No. Civ. 12753PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWard, J.
This is an appeal from an order appointing a receiver. Plaintiff in his complaint sought judgment for money had and received and on an account stated. Defendant answered and cross-complained, alleging a partnership in the business of “Floyd Baldwin, Painting and Decorating.” She demanded an accounting and filed a motion for the appointment of a receiver. Plaintiff answered defendant’s cross-complaint. Affidavits were filed by the parties in opposition to and in support of the application for the appointment of a receiver respectively. The matter was submitted upon the pleadings, the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Zeigler v. BonnellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Goes v. PerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Sunset Farms, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Lutz v. Merchants Nat. BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Breedlove v. J. W. & E. M. BreedLove Excavating Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- First Capitol Mortgage Corp. v. Talandis Construction Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1976
- Votaw Precision Tool Co. v. Air CanadaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Walker v. PorterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Armbrust v. ArmbrustCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Sibert v. ShaverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.