Davies v. Ramsdell
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Alameda County appointing a receiver pendente lite. William H. Waste, Judge. Affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
[1] This is an appeal from an order appointing a receiverpendente lite, in a suit in equity, more resembling the old suit to remove a cloud on title than the code suit merely to quiet title. The appellant contends the order should not have been made, as such appointments are not usually made in suits to quiet title. In this case there were equitable considerations before the court in addition to those of the ordinary suit to quiet title. Equity has inherent power in aid of its jurisdiction to grant injunctions and to appoint receivers, and the exercise of the power rests very largely in the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Doak v. BrusonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Foster v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Eversdon v. MayhewCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Craycroft v. McSwainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Davies v. RamsdellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Sunset Farms, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Lent v. HC Morris Co.California Court of Appeal · 1938
- Carroll v. CarrollCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Breedlove v. J. W. & E. M. BreedLove Excavating Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
- City of South San Francisco v. Cypress Lawn Cemetery Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.