Legal Opinion
Armbrust v. Armbrust
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 9, 1946No. Civ. 13002PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGo Odell, J.
Appellant by this appeal questions the validity of an order appointing a receiver pending the determination of a suit brought by him against his divorced wife to rescind a written agreement and to establish his interest in certain real and personal property, on the ground that there was no showing as required by Code of Civil Procedure, section 564, subdivision 1, that the property in dispute is in danger of being lost, removed, or materially injured.
The agreement in question was entered into by the parties hereto several months after their marriage in 1943. It provided in substance for the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Goes v. PerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Sunset Farms, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Lowe v. CopelandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Whitley v. BradleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
- Bank of Woodland v. StephensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Brown v. Memorial National Home FoundationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Rosenthal v. RosenthalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Sibert v. ShaverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Sullins v. SullinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
- Venza v. VenzaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.