Legal Opinion
Sibert v. Shaver
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 4, 1952No. Civ. 18963PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.
This appeal is from the order appointing a receiver. The original action was (a) to enforce (1) the rescission of an assignment by respondents of their interest in a patent and (2) an accounting to Mrs. Sibert as administratrix of the affairs of a partnership between appellant and decedent and (b) for a receiver. The facts are fully set forth in the decision of this court in action No. 18771. (111 Cal.App.2d 833 [245 P.2d 514].) By the judgment thereby affirmed, the court decreed (1) the existence of a partnership, (2) the rescission of the assignment of decedent’s interest in the patent on a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sunset Farms, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Sibert v. ShaverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Armbrust v. ArmbrustCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Breedlove v. J. W. & E. M. BreedLove Excavating Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
- Moore v. ObergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- DRG/Beverly Hills, Ltd. v. Chopstix Dim Sum Cafe and Takeout III, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1994
- Starbird v. LaneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- City and County of San Francisco v. DaleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Addiego v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Neider v. DardiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.