Legault v. Bd. of Trs. of Roseville
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. James D. Meredith, J. B. Landis, and P. H. Johnson, for Appellants.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
The city of Roseville is a city of the sixth class. Oscar L. Legault, petitioner, is or was the duly elected, qualified, and acting marshal of the city. The board of trustees preferred charges against the marshal for dereliction of duty, and cited him to show cause why he should not be removed from office. After a hearing the board of trustees formally ordered the petitioner to be removed from the office of marshal of the city of Roseville. Legault then petitioned for a writ of review, seeking to have it declared that the action of the board of trustees in the premises was in excess of its…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Coffey v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Matter of CarterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Schmidt v. WidberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Hyatt v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Richards v. ClarksburgWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1887
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Dameron v. AnsbroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
- Curtis v. McAuliffeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Rutledge v. DominguezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Walker v. City of San GabrielCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Walker v. City of San GabrielCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942