Walker v. City of San Gabriel
California Supreme Court
1Concurrence
TRAYNOR, J., Concurring.
The city council did not reserve the power to revoke licenses at its discretion. It reserved the power to revoke, if it adjudged, after a hearing on the law and the facts, that a legal ground for revocation was established. The ordinance vested the ■ adjudicating function in the council and prescribed that it should be exercised only after a hearing. It is sufficient to hold that the hearing intended was an adversary hearing, at which evidence was to be taken and a decision made, based on that evidence. The city had the burden of establishing its case, and until it…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Drummey v. State Board of Funeral Directors & EmbalmersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Laisne v. California State Board of OptometryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Garvin v. ChambersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Dierssen v. Civil Service CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Naughton v. Retirement Board of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.