Legal Opinion

Dameron v. Ansbro

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 27, 1918No. Civ. No. 1879PublishedCited by 26 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Joaquin County. C. W. Norton, Judge. Reversed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.

On the night of September 18, 1912, respondent, while asleep in his buggy, was crossing the railroad track of the Southern Pacific Company about sixteen miles from the city of Stockton, and he collided with a steam train traveling at the rate of thirty or thirty-five miles per hour. He was immediately taken at his request to the Dameron hospital in said city. He was examined by Dr. Dameron, the plaintiff and cross-defendant herein, and by Drs. L. E. and Harry Cross. One of the witnesses described Mr. Ansbro's appearance and condition as follows: “His clothes were torn, dirty and blood marked.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Dexter v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. Pierce v. United Gas and Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
  3. McGraw v. KerrColorado Court of Appeals · 1912
  4. Houghton v. DicksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
  5. Hesler v. California Hospital Co.California Supreme Court · 1918

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Sinz v. OwensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Citti v. BavaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Boxberger v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  4. Smith v. Ohio Oil Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1956
  5. Arnold v. California Portland Cement Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API