Hyatt v. Williams
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
This is an action to enjoin the defendants, who are respectively sued as mayor, members of the council, and clerk of the city of Stockton, from selling certain bonds amounting to $160,000, purporting to be bonds of the said city, authorized by the citizens thereof at an election held under the Bond Act of 1901. (Stats. 1901, p. 27, c. 32.) The object of the bond issue was to obtain funds wherewith to construct and maintain an electric lighting plant, by means of which the city proposes to light the streets, avenues, and public places of the city and to furnish the inhabitants of the city with…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Schmidt v. WidberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by36 opinions
- Ex Parte DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Clark v. City of Los AngeLesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- City of Madera v. BlackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Board of Medical Examiners v. MintzOregon Supreme Court · 1963
- Harden v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.