Schmidt v. Widber
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHabkison, J.
In September, 1890, respondent made an offer in writing to the board of supervisors of the city and county of San Francisco to sell to the city certain real property therein, known as Shag Rock, for the sum of fifteen thousand dollars. The communication was referred by the board of supervisors to the committee on health and police, and on the 2d of December, 1890, that committee reported in favor of the purchase, and its report was adopted by the board of supervisors. December 9, 1890, the board of supervisors adopted a resolution authorizing the committee on health and police to purchase the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Mcconoughey v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Baulec v. New York & Harlem RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Laforge v. MageeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1856
3Cited by43 opinions
- Ex Parte DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Boren v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- City of S. Pasadena v. Pasadena Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
- City of Madera v. BlackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- In Re City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.