Legal Opinion
Rutledge v. Dominguez
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 19, 1932No. Docket No. 8375PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON (IRA F.), J.
This is an application for a writ of mandate to compel the respondent city clerk of Los Angeles to omit from the ballot the name of John C. Porter as a candidate for election to the office of mayor. The controversy arises in this manner: A petition for the recall of Mayor Porter has been circulated and been found to be sufficient. The special election for that purpose has been fixed for the third day of May, 1932. The city charter provides in section 291 as follows:
“The ballots used at every recall election shall have printed thereon, as to every officer whose recall is…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cohn v. IsenseeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Legault v. Bd. of Trs. of RosevilleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- State v. BarburOregon Supreme Court · 1914
3Cited by10 opinions
- Stockton Savings & Loan Bank v. MassanetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Flewelling v. Board of Trustees of American River Junior College DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Lawing v. FaullCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Beatty v. HughesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Gallichotte v. California Mutual Building & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.