Legal Opinion
Curtis v. McAuliffe
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 21, 1930No. Docket No. 277PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.
Respondents in this case are the heirs at law of Stephen D. Curtis, who was killed in an automobile accident in the county of Fresno, California, on the twenty-sixth day of August, 1928. Deceased at the time he met his death was operating his automobile in which T. M. Wells was riding with him. The machine came into collision with one driven by appellant. The case was tried before a jury, and a verdict was rendered in favor of respondents and against appellant in the sum of seven thousand five hundred dollars.
Appellant relies upon two grounds for a reversal of the judgment. First he maintains…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Pierce v. United Gas and Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Citti v. BavaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Williamson v. HardyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Arnold v. California Portland Cement Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
- Roche v. Llewellyn Iron Works Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Zelayeta v. Pacific Greyhound Lines, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1951
- Scally v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1972
- Hill v. HilesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1941
- Sanguinetti v. Moore Dry Dock Co.California Supreme Court · 1951
- Brown v. YocumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.