Legal Opinion

Coffey v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided August 10, 1905No. Sac. No. 1360PublishedCited by 51 opinions

APPLICATION for Writ of Prohibition to the Superior Court of Sacramento County. E. C. Hart, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.

On August 24, 1904," the grand jury of the county of Sacramento presented and filed in the superior court of that county an accusation against M. Coffey, chief of police of the city of Sacramento, the petitioner herein.

The accusation, after alleging the official character of the petitioner, that the city of Sacramento is a municipal corporation governed by a freeholders’ charter, and that petitioner at all the times mentioned therein was the duly appointed, qualified, and acting chief of police of the city of Sacramento, charges that on the twenty-second, twenty-third, and twenty-fourth days…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Tilley v. SloverSupreme Court of Missouri · 1892
  2. Croly v. Board of Trustees of the City of SacramentoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Schmidlin v. City of Palo AltoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  2. Stark v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  3. State Ex Rel. Burns v. Linn, District JudgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. People v. HarbyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. City of Long Beach v. LisenbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API