Legal Opinion

In re Bertoni

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 13, 2018No. OSB 1516, 1559, 1617; SC S064820PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

**615The Oregon State Bar charged respondent with multiple violations of the Oregon *66Rules of Professional Conduct (RPC), which he allegedly committed while representing three clients: Prado-Hernandez, Monroy, and Lyons. A trial panel of the Disciplinary Board found that respondent had committed most but not all the charged violations. Essentially, the trial panel found that respondent had improperly handled his client's funds, failed to adequately communicate with his clients, and improperly retained client funds. Based on those violations, the trial panel suspended respondent from the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Norfolk Southern Corporation v. Chevron ChemicalCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
  2. Troutman v. ErlandsonOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  3. In Re JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Whitaker v. Bank of NewportOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of CohenOregon Supreme Court · 2000

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re LongOregon Supreme Court · 2021
  2. Wall v. AshCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  3. Bullseye Glass Co. v. BrownDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2019
  4. City of Springfield v. KellimCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  5. In re MunnOregon Supreme Court · 2024

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API