Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State v. Rozan

[¶ 25] I concur in the sanctions imposed by the Court and with most of the Court’s decision. I write separately for many of the same reasons I wrote in Disciplinary Board v. Wolff:

“I write separately on two points of law arising, I believe, because disciplinary counsel is unnecessarily ‘stacking’ allegations of rule violations and because the disciplinary board’s hearing panel has not sufficiently explained the rationale behind several of its findings of fact and conclusions of law on those issues. Doing so, I recognize Wolff did not object to the hearing panel’s findings of fact, conclusions…