In Re Complaint as to Conduct of Martin
Oregon Supreme Court
1Per curiam
In this lawyer disciplinary proceeding, the Oregon State Bar filed a complaint charging that the accused had violated Code of Professional Responsibility Disciplinary Rules (DR) 1-102(A)(3) (engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation) (three counts); DR 9-101(A) (failure to deposit client funds in trust account) (three counts); DR 9-101(A)(2) (failure to deposit disputed funds in trust account) (two counts); DR 2-110(A)(2) (failure to take reasonable steps to avoid foreseeable prejudice to client before withdrawing from employment); DR 9-101(0(3) (failure to…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Mustola v. ToddyOregon Supreme Court · 1969
- Fredeen v. StrideOregon Supreme Court · 1974
- Peterson v. RomineIdaho Supreme Court · 1998
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of ThomasOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HolmanOregon Supreme Court · 1984
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- In Re Complaint as to Conduct of DeversOregon Supreme Court · 1999
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HuffmanOregon Supreme Court · 2000
- Cron v. ZimmerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- In Re Complaint as to Conduct of WittemyerOregon Supreme Court · 1999
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of WyllieOregon Supreme Court · 2001
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.