Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to Conduct of Martin

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1998No. OSB 94-157, 94-158; SC S44004PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Per curiam

In this lawyer disciplinary proceeding, the Oregon State Bar filed a complaint charging that the accused had violated Code of Professional Responsibility Disciplinary Rules (DR) 1-102(A)(3) (engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation) (three counts); DR 9-101(A) (failure to deposit client funds in trust account) (three counts); DR 9-101(A)(2) (failure to deposit disputed funds in trust account) (two counts); DR 2-110(A)(2) (failure to take reasonable steps to avoid foreseeable prejudice to client before withdrawing from employment); DR 9-101(0(3) (failure to…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Mustola v. ToddyOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Fredeen v. StrideOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Peterson v. RomineIdaho Supreme Court · 1998
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of ThomasOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HolmanOregon Supreme Court · 1984

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to Conduct of DeversOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HuffmanOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Cron v. ZimmerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  4. In Re Complaint as to Conduct of WittemyerOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of WyllieOregon Supreme Court · 2001

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API