In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Obert
Oregon Supreme Court
1Per curiam
In this lawyer disciplinary proceeding, the Oregon State Bar (the Bar) charged Mark G. Obert (the accused) with nine violations of the Oregon Rules of Professional Conduct (RPC) arising out of his representation of two separate clients, Randy Favre and Ian Wilson. On the Favre matter, the Bar alleged violations of RPC 1.5(a) (charging or collecting a clearly excessive fee), RPC 1.15-l(a) (failure to deposit and maintain client funds in a separate trust account), RPC 1.15-l(c) (requiring lawyer to withdraw client money only as fees are earned or expenses incurred), RPC 1.15-l(d) (failure to…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of EadieOregon Supreme Court · 2001
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HawsOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- City of Portland v. DuntleyOregon Supreme Court · 1949
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of StaufferOregon Supreme Court · 1998
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of CohenOregon Supreme Court · 1993
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- In the Matter of Rachel R. AlexanderArizona Supreme Court · 2013
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HermanOregon Supreme Court · 2015
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of SanaiOregon Supreme Court · 2016
- In re BertoniOregon Supreme Court · 2018
- In re McGrawOregon Supreme Court · 2018
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.