In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Phelps
Oregon Supreme Court
1Per curiam
The Oregon State Bar charged the accused with violating numerous disciplinary rules in his handling of four different transactions. A Trial Panel of the Disciplinary Board found most of the charges proven by clear and convincing evidence and decided that the accused should be suspended from the practice of law for three years and required to pass the ethics portion of the Bar examination as a condition of reinstatement. On review de novo in this court, the Bar contends that the accused should be disbarred because his professional misconduct included misappropriation of funds belonging to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HolmanOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of LauryOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of MannisOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HowardOregon Supreme Court · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of StaufferOregon Supreme Court · 1998
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of KimmellOregon Supreme Court · 2001
- In Re Complaint as to Conduct of MurdockOregon Supreme Court · 1998
- Roberts v. FeareyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- In Re Complaint as to Conduct of MartinOregon Supreme Court · 1998
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.