Coolidge v. Austin
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order refusing a new trial. George H. Cabaniss, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLennon, P. J.
The plaintiff in this action of claim and delivery secured a judgment, awarding her the possession or the value of certain personal property. The plaintiff’s complaint contained all of the allegations usual and necessary to the statement of a cause of action in claim and delivery. The defendant by his answer denied all of the allegations of the complaint and in addition averred that he had acquired title to and possession of the property in suit by purchase in good faith for a valuable consideration from one W. H. Coolidge. Defendant further averred that he made such purchase without…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Goldstone v. Merchants' Ice & Cold Storage Co.California Supreme Court · 1899
- Snydacker v. BrosseIllinois Supreme Court · 1869
- Barstow v. Savage Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1883
- Woodsum v. ColeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Warren v. ConnorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kohn v. Sacramento Electric, Gas Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
- Johnson v. GarnerDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1916
- Woods v. CookCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- E. Bastheim Co. v. SchultzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Martin v. HollinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931