Legal Opinion

Woods v. Cook

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 12, 1936No. Civ. 10874PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWood, J.

A judgment in the sum of $1138 was recovered by plaintiffs against 6. H. Grace and George J. Cook and Connie Cook, copartners, doing business under the fictitious name and style of Cook’s Auto Supply Co. Prom the judgment an appeal is prosecuted by the defendants Cook. Plaintiff Mrs. Woods was driving an automobile on August 12, 1933, at the intersection of Slauson Avenue and San Pedro Street in the city of Los Angeles, at which time an auto truck owned by defendants Cook and operated by defendant Grace collided with the automobile of plaintiffs. The judgment was for damages sustained by…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Shields v. BarrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
  2. Cox v. McLaughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Frost v. WitterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Doolittle v. McConnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Castagnino v. BallettaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Day v. Western Loan & Building Co.California Court of Appeal · 1940
  2. Smith v. Los Angeles Bookbinders Union No. 63California Court of Appeal · 1955
  3. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. GreenbachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  4. Kaufman v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  5. Phillips v. HooperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API