Barstow v. Savage Mining Co.
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the District Court of the Twelfth Judicial District, city and. county of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMyrick, J.
The facts of this case, as presented in the findings, are substantially as follows:—
*390Prior to February 5, 1879, the defendant, the Savage Mining Company, duly issued its three certificares of stock, No. 24,843, certifying that C. A. Schmitt, trustee, is entitled to thirty shares of the capital stock of the said company, transferable on the books of the company by indorsement on and surrender of the certificate; No. 25,537.in the name of Randolph, Mackintosh & Company, trustees, for ten shares, and No. 25,704 in the name of Greenbaum, Helbing & Company, trustees, for ten shares, in like tenor…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- McNeil v. . the Tenth National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Covill v. Hill & SanfordNew York Supreme Court · 1847
- Winter v. Belmont Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1879
- Sherwood v. Meadow Valley Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1875
3Cited by30 opinions
- Knox v. Eden Musee Americain Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Swim v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Graves v. Mono Lake Hydraulic Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1889
- Kohn v. Sacramento Electric, Gas Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
- Scollans v. E. H. Rollins & SonsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.