Goldstone v. Merchants' Ice & Cold Storage Co.
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. William E. Daingerfield, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
CHIPMAN, C.
The action is to recover the possession of certain eighteen boxes of dressed turkeys (three thousand eight hundred pounds), or the value thereof if delivery cannot be had. The answer alleges that the turkeys were deposited with defendant by one Hoerr, in his own name, for safekeeping, and were the property of said Hoerr and one Clements, partners as Clements & Hoerr. Plaintiff was nonsuited at the close of his evidence, and judgment for defendant was entered accordingly. The appeal is from that judgment upon a bill of exceptions containing the evidence.
Appellant claims that the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Janin v. London & San Francisco BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Warner v. DarrowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Wright v. RoseberryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Felton v. MillardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- McQuilken v. Central Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- In Re the Estate of ArnoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Freese v. Hibernia Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Lasry v. LedermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Birch v. County of OrangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Hanley v. California Bridge & Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1899
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.