E. Bastheim Co. v. Schultz
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.
This action was, as framed by the complaint, in form, claim and delivery for the recovery of possession of two certain diamonds. Omitting the more formal allegations of .the complaint, it was . alleged that on the fourth day of December, 1916, defendants Schultz and Schlager obtained the diamonds from the plaintiff “upon the representation that they desired to exhibit the same to a third party for the purpose of inspection and then and there promised and agreed to promptly return the same to said plaintiff. ’ ’ It was alleged, on information and belief, that the said Schultz and Sehlager had…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Shafer v. LacyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Akron Cereal Co. v. First National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
- Coolidge v. AustinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
- Knapp v. LymanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
3Cited by8 opinions
- California Jewelry Co. v. Provident Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Chiamaka Adaoha Ukaga v. Fred Finch Youth & Family Services, et al.District Court, N.D. California · 2026
- Cooper v. TannerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Elwyn Robinson v. PPG Industries, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2021
- Hawkins v. Transdev Services, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2023
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.