Legal Opinion

Warren v. Connor

California Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1896No. Sac. No. 121PublishedCited by 1 opinion

APPEAL from Superior Court, Sacramento County; A. P. Gatlin, Judge. Action of trover by M. J. Warren against Sarah J. Connor and W. W. Connor for the conversion of certain personal property, consisting principally of farming implements, tried to the court without a jury, in which there was a judgment for plaintiff. From an order denying their motion for a new trial defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

HAYNES, C.

This appeal is by the defendants from an order denying their motion for a new trial. The action is in trover for the conversion of certain personal property, consisting principally of farming implements, of the alleged value of $660. The cause was tried by the court without a jury, and the court found that the defendants had converted to their own use certain specified portions of the said property, of the value of $594. The .plaintiff claims title to the property in controversy through an alleged sale thereof by Thomas Hovenden to her. This property was upon a large ranch…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Coolidge v. AustinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API