Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Garner

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided June 16, 1916No. A-17PublishedCited by 14 opinions

In Equity. Bill by Roxa S. Johnson against William S. Johnson, in which J. T. Garner, as administrator with the will annexed of the estate of William S. Johnson, was substituted as defendant, the defendant dying pending trial, and in which the Tonopah Banking Corporation and another intervened.

1Opinion of the Court

FARRINGTON, District Judge.

W. S. Johnson and Roxa S. Johnson became husband and wife in November, 1890. The only issue of the marriage is one son, Clemmer, now about 21 years of age. December 14, 1909, at Tonopah, Nev., the husband .obtained a decree of divorce on the ground of desertion. August 8, 1913, Roxa Johnson brought the present suit in this court to recover her share of the community property; 10 days later a receiver was appointed, who was authorized to take charge, possession, and control of all the property of said W. S. Johnson and Roxa Johnson within this jurisdiction.

W. S.…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Brown v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Yonley v. LavenderSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  3. De Godey v. GodeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
  4. Melvin v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Lake v. BenderNevada Supreme Court · 1884

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Cosper v. the Valley BankArizona Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Robertson v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
  3. Kramer v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Interurban Const. Co. v. Central State Bank of KieferSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  5. Eppes v. Dade Developers, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1936

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API