Skaggs v. Taylor
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.
Plaintiff brought this action in claim and delivery to recover possession of an automobile which, following the commencement of this action, was seized by the sheriff subject to the usual replevin proceedings, and upon the failure of defendant to except to the sufficiency of plaintiff’s sureties or to give an undertaking for its return, was delivered before the trial into the possession of the plaintiff. At the trial judgment of nonsuit was entered and although defendant’s answer contained a claim for the return of said automobile or its value in case a return could not be had, no order or…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pico v. PicoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Erreca v. MeyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Etchepare v. AguirreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Kowalsky v. NicholsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
- Nahhas v. BrowningCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Scrimsher v. Reliance Rock Co.California Court of Appeal · 1934
- Six Companies of California v. Joint Highway Dist. No. 13Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
- HOUSING AUTHORITY OF CITY OF LOS ANGELES v. PetersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Peterson v. First National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Janssen v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.