Legal Opinion

Peterson v. First National Bank

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 29, 1929No. Docket No. 6863PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRAY, J., pro tem.

In this action for the recovery of Liberty and Victory bonds and a note and mortgage securing the same from the defendant bank, the action having been dismissed as to the other defendants, the pleadings framed for decision the following issues: (1) The character, conditional or absolute, of the delivery to the bank by plaintiff’s assignor, her husband, of his promissory note; (2) the conditions under which the bank obtained possession of the bonds, note and mortgage; (3) the extent of the obligations secured by Carlo Lepori’s pledge, and satisfied by its performance, and (4)…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Steinberger v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Hind v. Oriental Products Co., Inc.California Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Hassell v. BungeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Lawrence v. Premier Indemnity Assurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Erreca v. MeyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kunz v. NelsonUtah Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Stafford v. RussellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  3. SECURITY FIRST NAT. BANK OF LA v. RospawCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  4. Moskovitz v. LefrancoisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  5. Englert v. Ivac Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API