Legal Opinion

Etchepare v. Aguirre

California Supreme Court

Decided September 21, 1891No. 14298PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Vanclief, C.

Action to recover the possession of personal property or the value thereof, commonly called. “ claim and delivery of personal property.”

The defendant, as sheriff of Los Angeles County, seized the property in question by virtue of a writ of attachment as the property of the defendant in the attachment suit, from whom the plaintiff claims to have purchased it before the levy of the attachment. It is alleged in the answer of the defendant that the sale of the property to plaintiff was fraudulent and void as to the creditors of the defendant in attachment, and this was the principal…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Stevens v. IrwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Cahoon v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  3. Hunt v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
  4. Pico v. PicoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Washburn v. HuntingtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Murphy v. MulgrewCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. George v. PierceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Hynes v. BarnesMontana Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Kunz v. NelsonUtah Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Meads, Seaman & Co. v. LasarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API