Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Janssen v. County of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 19, 1942No. Civ. 12622PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYork, P. J.

The above entitled actions, consolidated for trial, were brought by the respective plaintiffs, the legal owners of adjoining realty abutting the San Gabriel River, to recover damages for injury to their respective parcels of land. The defendants in each case are the county of Los Angeles, the Los Angeles County Flood Control District, C. H. Howell, who for a time was the chief engineer of said district, and Harold E. Hedger, Sr. (sued as Howard E. Hedger, Sr.) who was senior assistant chief engineer of the district from 1934 to 1938 and in charge of the work done in the San Gabriel River in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pumpelly v. Green Bay Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Sutro Heights Land Co. v. Merced Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Farmers' Reservoir & Irrigation Co. v. CooperSupreme Court of Colorado · 1913
  4. Scrimsher v. Reliance Rock Co.California Court of Appeal · 1934
  5. Turpen v. Turlock Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Frustuck v. City of FairfaxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  2. Hayashi v. Alameda County Flood Control & Water Conservation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  3. People v. AdamsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  4. City of Santa Cruz v. MacGregorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. Tri-Chem, Inc. v. Los Angeles County Flood Control DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API