Nahhas v. Browning
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Colusa County. Ernest Weyand, Judge. ' The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLennon, J.
The plaintiffs herein sue on a replevin bond, Browning, the plaintiff in the replevin action, and Balsdon and Morris, Ms sureties, being joined as defendants. The property replevied consisted of a harvesting outfit. It was destroyed by fire while in the possession of Browning, who thereafter dismissed the replevin suit. The plaintiffs thereupon instituted this action and recovered judgment on a verdict awarding damages in the sum of $3,695. The verdict of the jury was accompanied by answers to certain questions submitted by the court, which indicated r|that the sum of $3,695 had been arrived…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Garcia v. GunnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Hunt v. ThompsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1912
- Mills v. GleasonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
- Freeborn v. NorcrossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
- Clary v. RollandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Drinkhouse v. Van NessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Blodgett v. RheinschildCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- LeFave v. DimondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Beetson v. Hollywood Athletic ClubCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Ruzanoff v. Retailers Credit Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1929
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.