Legal Opinion

Scrimsher v. Reliance Rock Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 13, 1934No. Civ. 8626PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PACHT, J., pro tem.

Appellant, Reliance Rock Company, seeks reversal of a judgment of fifteen thousand ($15,000) dollars and costs, based upon the verdict of a jury rendered herein against it and in favor of Mamie Scrimsher, widow, and Winfred Austin Scrimsher, minor child of William Austin Scrimsher, deceased.

The action, which is one for damages for the death of decedent, caused by the claimed negligence of the appellant, was twice tried. Originally commenced September 28, 1927, against Reliance Rock Company, appellant here, and Robert C. Barnes, as defendants, the cause first proceeded to…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Anderson v. GoffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Clary v. HoaglandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1856
  3. Pacific Paving Co. v. VizelichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Paul v. CragnazNevada Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Ferris v. BakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Gore v. BingamanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. McColgan v. Jones, Hubbard & Donnell, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Carpenter v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Security-First National Bank v. CooperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  5. Pessarra v. PessarraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API