Legal Opinion
Six Companies of California v. Joint Highway Dist. No. 13
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 14, 1940No. 9113PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HEALY, Circuit Judge.
Six Companies of California, a Nevada corporation, contracted with Joint Highway District No. 13 of the State of California to construct the Broadway Tunnel, near Oakland. For convenience these parties will be referred to as the Contractor and the District. After part performance the Contractor attempted to rescind and brought suit to recover the reasonable value of materials and labor theretofore furnished, asserting that the District had breached the contract and had misrepresented the nature of the country through which the tunnel was to be driven.
The District…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Russell v. ToddSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States v. Bethlehem Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- United States v. GleasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- United States v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Six Companies of Cal. v. Joint Highway Dist. No. 13 of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Pacific Employers Insurance v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Silva & Hill Construction Co. v. Employers Mutual Liability InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Bowbells Public School District No. 14 v. WalkerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
- Lake View Trust & Savings Bank v. Filmore Construction Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.