Legal Opinion
HOUSING AUTHORITY OF CITY OF LOS ANGELES v. Peters
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 15, 1953No. Docket Nos. 19792, 19793PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.
After trial without a jury, judgment was rendered in favor of plaintiff in the above actions, which were consolidated for trial, condemning the property of defendants under the power of eminent domain for the construction of a housing project. From the judgment defendants appeal.
Defendants concede in their opening brief that the basic points which they raise have been passed on adversely to their contentions in Housing Authority v. Shoecraft (hearing denied by the Supreme Court), 116 Cal.App.2d 813 [254 P.2d 628] (see, also, Housing Authority v. Dockweiler, 14 Cal.2d 437, 449 et seq. [94 P.2d…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- The Housing Authority v. DockweilerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Thatch v. LivingstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Bridges v. FiskCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- People v. WhitakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Riggin v. DockweilerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- In Re Retirement CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Scott v. E. L. Yeager Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1970
- Markman v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Houghton v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Levy v. Bellmar EnterprisesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.