Legal Opinion

Ehrlich v. McConnell

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 21, 1963No. Civ. 26392PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURKE, P. J.—Appellants

appeal from a judgment of the superior court which denied their petition for a writ of mandate to compel respondent Insurance Commissioner to set aside his decision suspending their licenses for a period of six months.

Appellants are licensed insurance agents and brokers and in October 1957 they made a concerted effort to attract “bad risk” business from persons whose drivers’ licenses had been suspended or reinstated. Approximately 90 per cent of appellants’ business was secured by soliciting such persons.

An accusation was filed by respondent with the Department of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Haines v. Commercial Mortgage Co.California Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Milana v. Credit Discount Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
  3. People v. SiemsenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  4. People v. GordonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  5. Wade v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rose v. City of HaywardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  2. People v. ThompsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  3. People v. MaldonadoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  4. Feist v. RoweCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. Douglass v. Board of Medical Quality AssuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API