Legal Opinion

Milana v. Credit Discount Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1945No. L. A. 19413PublishedCited by 88 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

The plaintiff appealed from a judgment of nonsuit in an action to establish that certain purported purchases by the defendants of accounts receivable were usurious loans, and to recover treble the amount of interest paid within one year prior to the commencement of the action. (Stats. 1919, p. lxxxiii, Const., art. XX, § 22.) Assuming the transactions to be loans the court appointed a referee to report on the amount of interest that had been paid. Upon the filing of the referee’s report the trial continued. At the close of the plaintiff’s case a motion for a nonsuit was granted on the ground…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Haines v. Commercial Mortgage Co.California Supreme Court · 1927
  2. In re Grand Union Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914
  3. Terry Trading Corp. v. BarskyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Bundy v. . Commercial Credit Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  5. Bundy v. Commercial Credit Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by88 opinions

  1. Neilson v. ChangCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  2. West Pico Furniture Co. v. Pacific Finance LoansCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Glaire v. La Lanne-Paris Health Spa, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Moe v. Transamerica Title InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  5. Golceff v. SugarmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950

83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API