People v. Thompson
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SELBER, J. *
— From an order of respondent superior court setting aside defendant’s plea of guilty, the People seek relief by both an appeal and petition for writ of mandate. Pursuant to stipulation the briefs filed in the writ proceeding have been deemed the briefs on appeal. Both matters are accordingly treated together in this opinion.
People contend: (1) that respondent court exceeded its jurisdiction in setting aside defendant’s plea of guilty on its own motion after defendant Thompson expressly refused the court’s invitation to so move, and (2) that they are entitled to relief…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Abelleira v. District Court of AppealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- People v. ValentiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- People v. GoldsteinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- People v. Superior Court (Zamudio)California Supreme Court · 2000
- People v. DrakeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Zaragosa v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Gonzalez v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- People v. Superior Court (Brodie)California Court of Appeal · 1975
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.