Legal Opinion

People v. Maldonado

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 15, 1966No. Crim. 10258PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShinn, P. J.

Appellants Maldonado and Holman, each convicted by jury of two counts of violation of section 288a of the Penal Code, given suspended sentences and placed on probation, appeal from the orders, as judgments.

Separate briefs have been filed. Holman, having refused to accept the services of appointed counsel, prepared his own briefs.

First to be considered is the contention of both appellants that the evidence upon which they were convicted, consisting of the testimony of police officers as to their observations through what amounted to a hidden peephole into a men’s restroom of a theatre, was…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. People v. CockrellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Bielicki v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Bielicki v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. People v. TriggsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. State v. BryantSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  3. People v. BoehmCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  4. People v. RobertsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. People v. NormanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API