Legal Opinion

Haines v. Commercial Mortgage Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1927No. Docket No. L.A. 9134PublishedCited by 115 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.

Respondents, plaintiffs below, executed to appellant and defendant below, Commercial Mortgage Company, a note as follows:

“$34,000.00. Los Angeles, California, July 2, 1924.
“In installments and at the times hereinafter stated, for value received, we, jointly and severally, promise to pay to Commercial Mortgage Company, a corporation, or order, at its offices in Los Angeles, California, the principal sum of Thirty-four thousand and no/100 Dollars, with interest from date on the amount of principal remaining from time to time unpaid until said principal sum is paid at the rate of twelve per cent…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Wallace v. ZinmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Bacon Service Corporation v. Huss.California Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Mordecai v. Board of Supervisors of County of MaderaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Blodgett v. RheinschildCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  5. Jackson v. ShawlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by115 opinions

  1. Carter v. Seaboard Finance Co.California Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Milana v. Credit Discount Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Atlas Thrift Co. v. HoranCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  4. Terry Trading Corp. v. BarskyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Roesch v. De MotaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944

110 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API